Fulfilled.fyi

Serouj Mamoulian

Joel Richardson presents a series of strong claims against full preterism, framing it as heretical, philosophically corrupt, and spiritually dangerous. However, when examined closely, these claims consistently fail on their own terms, and more importantly, they often backfire the very dispensational framework he represents.

Serouj Mamoulian · 3 min read

Serouj Mamoulian · 4 min read

Serouj Mamoulian · 5 min read

Serouj Mamoulian · 6 min read

Serouj Mamoulian · 10 min read

Serouj Mamoulian · 9 min read

Serouj Mamoulian · 4 min read

Serouj Mamoulian · 7 min read

One of the strongest objections raised against the preterist view is the charge that it revives what Paul condemned as the “Hymenaean heresy.” In 2 Timothy 2, Paul warns about men who claimed that the resurrection was already past and who, in doing so, were overthrowing the faith of some. Because consistent preterism teaches that the resurrection was fulfilled in the first-century passing of the Old Covenant order, many assume this is precisely what Paul was condemning.